Published on Apr 06, 2006 by Edgar Snyder

Merck Loses Second Vioxx Case

Merck Loses Second Vioxx Case

A jury found Merck guilty of not properly warning patients about the dangers of its drug Vioxx and guilty of causing the heart attack in plaintiff John McDarby. The jury awarded $3 million in compensatory damages to Mr. McDarby and an additional $1.5 million to his wife.

Mr. McDarby suffered a heart attack after taking Vioxx continuously for 48 months.

For misleading doctors about the risks of Vioxx, the jury also found Merck guilty of consumer fraud and awarded Mr. McDarby an additional $12,000, triple the amount he paid for his prescriptions of Vioxx. Merck is also required to pay some of Mr. McDarby’s lawyers’ fees.

Merck took Vioxx off the market in 2004 when clinical trials proved the drug caused an increase risk of cardiovascular problems in people who took the drug for at least 18 months. At the end of 2005, an estimated 9,600 drug liability suits had been filed, representing 19,000 groups of plaintiffs. It has been estimated that as many as 100,000 people might have suffered heart attacks because of taking Vioxx.

For more information about Vioxx and other dangerous drugs, visit the Dangerous Drug Legal Center.

Please note: All of our lawyers are licensed to practice in the state of Pennsylvania. We also have lawyers licensed to practice in Ohio, and West Virginia and we associate with experienced attorneys in other states. In addition, all drug-related litigation involves co-counsel.

Source: “A 2nd Loss for Merck Over Vioxx.” By Alex Berenson. The New York Times. April 6, 2006.
Free Case Review
First Name
Last Name
Briefly describe your injuries